Actual maximum print size?
Actual maximum print size?
While I was going over the printer this evening tightening the nuts and screw I started messing with the effector.
I discovered that the actual print volume will be closer to 125 x 200mm and not the 190 x 200mm as advertised in the spec!
If I try to move the effector past the 60mm radius the rods twist up the effector and the carriages.
Had I tried doing this with the printer on I am sure it would have resulted in a lot of snapped parts.
So where does the figure 190 x 200mm come from?
(Pulled from wiki)
Print Plate Size: 210 x 3mm
Print Volume: 190 x 200mm
I discovered that the actual print volume will be closer to 125 x 200mm and not the 190 x 200mm as advertised in the spec!
If I try to move the effector past the 60mm radius the rods twist up the effector and the carriages.
Had I tried doing this with the printer on I am sure it would have resulted in a lot of snapped parts.
So where does the figure 190 x 200mm come from?
(Pulled from wiki)
Print Plate Size: 210 x 3mm
Print Volume: 190 x 200mm
Re: Actual maximum print size?
hi,please tell me your printer type.JohnP wrote:While I was going over the printer this evening tightening the nuts and screw I started messing with the effector.
I discovered that the actual print volume will be closer to 125 x 200mm and not the 190 x 200mm as advertised in the spec!
If I try to move the effector past the 60mm radius the rods twist up the effector and the carriages.
Had I tried doing this with the printer on I am sure it would have resulted in a lot of snapped parts.
So where does the figure 190 x 200mm come from?
(Pulled from wiki)
Print Plate Size: 210 x 3mm
Print Volume: 190 x 200mm
Re: Actual maximum print size?
hi,it should be a cylinder,it's diameter is 190.Thank you for you remind,we will improve it later.JohnP wrote:G2
Re: Actual maximum print size?
Hi,
I had a similar problem, I'm not sure it's the same one though.
My print-surface was also smaller than advertised, the issue was the washers used to keep the rods in place. They impede full movements.
Video to show the problem:
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D ... ideo%2cmp4
As you can see in the video, the washers they send you are to big and doesn't allow full movement so the rotation is limited and so creates a smaller print size.
By removing the washers you will have full size BUT because no washers the rods will giggle which is bad for print accuracy. I solved that by using those small rubber O-rings that you buy on hardware store for sealing bathrooms stuff-ish.
Hope it was the same issue
I had a similar problem, I'm not sure it's the same one though.
My print-surface was also smaller than advertised, the issue was the washers used to keep the rods in place. They impede full movements.
Video to show the problem:
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D ... ideo%2cmp4
As you can see in the video, the washers they send you are to big and doesn't allow full movement so the rotation is limited and so creates a smaller print size.
By removing the washers you will have full size BUT because no washers the rods will giggle which is bad for print accuracy. I solved that by using those small rubber O-rings that you buy on hardware store for sealing bathrooms stuff-ish.
Hope it was the same issue
Re: Actual maximum print size?
hi,johnp,sorry for my presentation mistake ,i mean i will modify the parameter in wiki .
the real specification is rint Volume: cylindrical,D:190mm,H:200mm.
please look at the pictures.in my repetier host,i can move x to -90.
and in the firmware DELTA_PRINTABLE_RADIUS is defined as 90 ,it was to protect the delta G2 from over-distance when moving,so if you want to get the prints of which radiu is 95,you can modifiy it in the firmware.
if you have any question,please contact me.
the real specification is rint Volume: cylindrical,D:190mm,H:200mm.
please look at the pictures.in my repetier host,i can move x to -90.
and in the firmware DELTA_PRINTABLE_RADIUS is defined as 90 ,it was to protect the delta G2 from over-distance when moving,so if you want to get the prints of which radiu is 95,you can modifiy it in the firmware.
if you have any question,please contact me.
- Attachments
-
- QQ图片20150731113144.png (9.58 KiB) Viewed 11167 times
-
- QQ图片20150731112905.jpg (105.04 KiB) Viewed 11167 times
-
- QQ图片20150731112911.jpg (77.49 KiB) Viewed 11167 times
Re: Actual maximum print size?
hi,it seems that the washer is assemble in a wrong way.the correct assembly is like what display in the picture.Aeonster wrote:Hi,
I had a similar problem, I'm not sure it's the same one though.
My print-surface was also smaller than advertised, the issue was the washers used to keep the rods in place. They impede full movements.
Video to show the problem:
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D ... ideo%2cmp4
As you can see in the video, the washers they send you are to big and doesn't allow full movement so the rotation is limited and so creates a smaller print size.
By removing the washers you will have full size BUT because no washers the rods will giggle which is bad for print accuracy. I solved that by using those small rubber O-rings that you buy on hardware store for sealing bathrooms stuff-ish.
Hope it was the same issue
- Attachments
-
- QQ图片20150729155023.png (245.9 KiB) Viewed 11160 times